|
The Mummy
Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor
(or
The Mummy Movie With The Same Formula As Before
Except In China And Without Any Mummies.)
Commentary On The Movie
By Tim McGuinness, Ph.D.,
August 13th, 2008
Here we go again,
with another Mummy Movie!
While I really didn't expect
much reality from this production company, and while it was a generally
entertaining farce, here again Hollywood doesn't even bother to try to get
anything right.
In the first Mummy movie, it
gave us a fantastically fun adventure with some plausibility, and invoking a
huge number of myths from Ancient Egypt. It even got a few things right!
The story hung together well, and is considered something of a classic now - not
at the level of the first Indiana Jones movie, but solid in its own right.
Then they did a cheap sequel, which wasn't as
good as the first, but it was still fun and adventurous - though the science was
just thrown away. Of course, how much science can there really be when we are
talking about walking talking mummies? The second film though stayed in
the same realm of Egyptian mythology that carried the first film - though more
inaccuracies than could ever be counted.
Now we have a third installment,
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon
Emperor, and this tomb is full of well... crap!
Let's examine the central or
foundational element of this latest movie: The Mummy. The problem
here is that it's NOT a mummy. Mummies are produced by a few different
processes, from artificial mummification (as in Egypt), to natural mummification
(as in Peru). The Dragon Emperor was cursed (per the story), and
transformed in mud, along with his whole army. And while there were plenty
of undead to shake a stick at in this movie, where were the mummies?
Another central piece of this movie is the
Great Wall itself. The film shows a single emperor building the Great
Wall. Yet the truth is that built over thousands of years over innumerable
building campaigns. And the film could have performed a substantial public
service by drawing attention of the fragile state of the wall.
According to
Scott de Brestian "While most of
us have a mental image of a solid, stone wall stretching off into the
distance, a product of stock photos and tourist itineraries, the Wall is
actually a complex work, built over thousands of years over innumerable
building campaigns. Substantial sections were built in more fragile mud
brick. Now, although not as sturdy as stone, this in itself is not
necessarily a problem for conservation. After all, much of the wall has
survived for millennia. However, unrestrained farming in north-central China
has resulted in conditions approximating the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. This is
bad not only for the inhabitants of the region, but for monuments such as
the Great Wall. Already more than 25 miles of wall have been
completely eroded by sandstorms in the last 20 years, but much of the
rest of the 'standing' wall has been reduced to little more than stubs on
the landscape, as the picture above shows. Archaeologists are trying to
protect the remaining sections by burying them in dirt, but this can only be
a stopgap measure. At the current rate of degradation, this entire portion
of the Wall will be gone in 20 years. "
I won't even go into the invented mythology of
Shangri La,
since that was a total waste in this movie. Nor the Yeti, though I enjoyed how they
were shown. Interestingly, yetis are claimed to have or still exist, and
there is aledged proof in the form of a purported scalp at Khumjung monastery in
Tibet. The name Yeti is derived from the Tibetan "je-tiet" - the full name
meaning "rock bear". If The Scorpion King sequel is anything to go by,
though, those Yetis will probably get their own spin-off movie - The Return Of
The Yeti.
Ironically, the film was supposed to be based
upon supernatural and mythical characters, yet I have to say there really was
nothing particularly supernatural, except for landing a small British
fighter-bomber on an ice-shelf. What was especially interesting was how
they used quantum physics to double the inside volume of this aircraft, and fly
it well above its operational ceiling.
Of course I haven't really ranted about how
archaeology is represented by this miscreant collection of looters and grave
robbers calling themselves archaeologists. But it's just more of the same
from an industry that just doesn't care.
The rest is just not worth the words to trash
it. It's a 10 year old boys view of archaeology, adventure, and not much
more!
Related
Links:
Back » |