Avatar by James Cameron
Science
& Conquest Commentary
By Tim McGuinness, Ph.D.,
December 20, 2009
What to say about Avatar? Why am I even commenting on this
Science Fiction? It's not archaeology, right?
It's simple. This is one of the most breath-taking movies
ever made! And it deals with one of the most fundamental
tenets of Archaeology.
But first, imagine it's
your job to create an entirely new world, an entirely new
culture, and an entirely new evolution? The Director of
Avatar, James Cameron, did just these very things. And he
did it nearly flawlessly. I say nearly...but I'll come back
to that later.
In essence, this is a familiar tale of conquest and
resistance. Your basic Pocahontas in the future, except this
time, John Smith is a disabled ex-Marine named Jake Sully,
who is tasked with winning the reluctant cooperation of an
indigenes people, so they can be exploited - conquered. This
has many parallels - no doubt purposefully - with our own
historical events: Cortez and the conquest of Mexico,
Pocahontas and the entire history of conquest of the North American
Indians, and many others.
What struck
me most about the movie Avatar was the anthropology - very
well developed, complete with a functioning mythology,
rituals, and social structure. It is one that parallel many of the
American and Asian early cultures in harmony with their
environment. I suspect that it was vastly more developed
than we were able to see in just a three hour movie, but
what was shown was a joy to behold. I hope that in time, the
fullness of their creation will become available for further
study, perhaps becoming a learning environment for the
training
of future anthropologists as well.
However, what
made me want to comment on this movie Avatar, more than
anything, is the simple reality of science, and the growing
public distrust of science. Science is the quest for
knowledge, yet often, in that quest far too much is damaged
along the path. Contrary to public opinion, driven by an
ignorant media, science is not about science at any cost.
Science is the concerted human effort to understand, or to
understand better, the history of the natural world and how
the natural world works, with observable physical evidence
as the basis of that understanding. It is done through
observation of natural phenomena, and/or through
experimentation that tries to simulate natural processes
under controlled conditions. That's what science is, but why
does any society devote so much of its resources to this
business of developing new knowledge about the natural
world, or what has motivated scientists to devote their
lives to developing this new knowledge? To understand how
things get out of hand, one must understand the motivation.
The answer
lies in the desire to improve people's lives. Geneticists
trying to understand how certain conditions are passed from
generation to generation and biologists tracing the pathways
by which diseases are transmitted are clearly seeking
information that may
better the lives of very ordinary people. Earth scientists
developing better models for the prediction of weather or
for the prediction
of earthquakes, landslides, and volcanic eruptions are
likewise seeking knowledge that can help avoid the hardships
that have plagued
humanity for centuries. Any society concerned about the
welfare of its people, which is at the least any democratic
society, will
support efforts like these to better people's lives.
Another
reason is society's desires for economic
development. Many earth scientists devote their work to
finding more
efficient or more effective ways to discover or recover
natural resources like petroleum and ores. Plant scientists
seeking strains or
species of fruiting plants for crops are ultimately working
to increase the agricultural output that nutritionally and
literally
enriches nations. Chemists developing new chemical
substances with potential technological applications and
physicists developing new
phenomena like superconductivity are likewise developing
knowledge that may spur economic development. In a world
where nations
increasingly view themselves as caught up in economic
competition, support of such science is nothing less than an
investment in the
economic future.
Still another
reason is humanity's increasing control over our planet and
its environment. Much science is done to understand how the
toxins
and wastes of our society pass through our water, soil, and
air, potentially to our own detriment. Much science is also
done to
understand how changes that we cause in our atmosphere and
oceans may change the climate in which we live, and that can
control our sources of food and water. In a sense, such
science seeks to develop an "Owner's Manual" that we will
need as we increasingly, if
unwittingly, take control of the global ecosystem and a host
of local ecosystems.
Also,
societies support science because of simple curiosity, and
because of the satisfaction that comes from knowledge of the
world
around us. Few of us will ever derive any economic benefit
from knowing that the starlight we see in a clear night sky
left those stars
millions or billions of years ago, so that what we observe
is a message of the very distant past. However, the awe,
perspective, and
perhaps even serenity derived from that knowledge is very
valuable to many of us personally. Likewise, few of us will
derive greater
physical well-being from watching a flowing stream and from
reflecting on the hydrologic cycle through which that
stream's water has
passed, from the distant ocean to the floating clouds of our
skies to the rains and storms upstream and now to the river
channel at
which we stand. However, the sense of interconnectedness
that comes from such knowledge enriches our understanding of
our world, and of our lives, in a very valuable way. By
understanding the stars in our sky and the rivers under our
bridges, we better understand who we are and our place in
the world. When intangible benefits like these are combined
with the more tangible ones outlined above, it's no wonder
that most modern societies support scientific research for
the improvement of our understanding of the world around us.
The best
science recognizes the simple truth: perhaps with some
skepticism, that scientific (and only theoretical)
understanding of the
natural world, which is derived from all the observations
and measurements described above, leaves out an important
element. On the
other hand, or perhaps an other option, is to accept
traditional understandings of the natural world developed
centuries or even
millennia ago by people who, regardless how wise or
well-meaning, had only sharp eyes and fertile imaginations
as their best tools. Both of these approaches by themselves
leave much unknown, and misunderstood. But science can
bring a harmony, through rigorous understanding, coupled with
comprehension and compassion. So that we understand both the
facts and the context, that let us explore, but also
preserve. That let us know, but do no harm in the
process!
Avatar brings
this point home. One of the truths about encounters between
civilizations, here on Terra, or on Pandora, is that the
more
advanced civilization destroyed the less advanced - or at
the very least leaves it profoundly changed. It happens in a
million ways,
and science plays a huge role in this usually. Ironically,
one of the clearest recognitions of this was created in the
1960's on a
weekly TV show known as Start Trek. Their enlightened view
was known as the "Prime Directive" - non-interference with
less-developed species and cultures - establish a firewall
around their civilization, and allow them to develop on
their own.
In Avatar, the anthropologists and scientists were active
collaborators in the planning for destruction. While the
point was made that
they were unknowing and unwilling, they were also spineless.
It wasn't until the ex-marine Jake Sully came along that the
survival of
the Na'vi became a priority (Pandorans, the residents of the Planet (actually
a moon) Pandora). Though in the story, initially, he too had
no regard for
what was to be destroyed. Yet through observation and
understanding, he came to realize the value in the Na'vi
culture and environment,
and the impact of human greed.
While in the Avatar story, the locals prevailed, they were
never the less altered forever. Humanity is the
personification of greed,
yet we are able to understand our failings, and balance our
needs and wants, with those of others. Whenever we have
failed to do this,
weaker civilizations have perished.
As an Archaeologist, I study civilizations destroyed in just
this way. Yet in this understanding is the hope that our
future selves
will learn from our failures and conquests, and truly
believe in the value in every civilization we may encounter
in our future.
I am grateful to James Cameron, for returning to film with
such an incredible adventure, and for making the movie
Avatar a focused
learning experience for all mankind!
Oh, I said
above that the creation of this world was almost perfect?
I saw only one major flaw. Can you guess? Every
creature we saw on the planet Pandora has six limbs, except
one. The Na'vi did not! On Earth (Terra), all
mammals have four
limbs - including humans - because we have common ancestors
and common DNA. Did the Na'vi not evolve on Pandora?
A curious flaw.
A request
though, make Pandora available to us all - let us explore
(virtually) the ecosystem you created - please!
We invite essays and movies
reviews from professional archaeologists and anthropologists also.
Feel free to send us your review to archaeologymoviereviews @ mcguinnesspublishing
.
com
ArchaeologyAtTheMovies.com
An Ancient America Archaeology Site
Published by
McGuinnessPublishing Created
by Tim McGuinness, Ph.D., Member of the Society for American
Archaeology The
information presented is believed to be correct and accurate.
However,
please let us know of any errors.
Please send comments to: wesayso
@
mcguinnesspublishing
.
com
This is a scholarly work for non-profit educational purposes.
Presented FREE to students, teachers & educators, and the public in
the interest of developing awareness of the subject and in helping
to preserve our common heritage. Some content is public
domain, some content used under "Fair Use" provision of section 107
U.S. Copyright Law. Some content from third-parties. All
third-party copyrights acknowledged. Sources credited where
possible or known. If we have not correctly credited a source
- please let us know.
Our Websites are dedicated
to:
Kyra, and the whole McFamily! Past, Present, and Future!
Past, Present, and Future - Here, There, and Everywhere! And to
friends in Spain, Costa Rica, Peru, and a Land Down Under - You know who you are!
We do
not request or use ANY personally identifiable information on this
website, nor do we collect such information.
We use
third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our
website. These companies may use information (not including your
name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits
to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about
goods and services of interest to you.
Google,
as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on this site.
Google's
use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to our users based on
their visit to our sites and other sites on the Internet.